Legal Custody
- by Eric C. Nelson, Attorney
In Minnesota, custody is defined in terms of legal custody and physical custody. The scope of this article is legal custody.
Legal custody is defined as "the right to determine the child's upbringing, including education, health care, and religious training." [1] Most of the time, parties to a custody case are awarded joint legal custody, which means that "both parents have equal rights and responsibilities, including the right to participate in major decisions determining the child's upbringing, including education, health care, and religious training." [2]
In deciding whether to award joint legal custody, the Court considers the following factors:
In my experience, the Court will almost always award joint legal custody, unless there are strong reasons not to, such as a very serious inability to cooperate or communicate, [6] or serious parental disfunction on the part of one parent—e.g., serious alcohol or drug addiction, physical or sexual abusiveness, or a long history of a lack of involvement in the children's parenting.
Should parties with joint legal custody ever reach an impasse over a legal custody issue, such as the choice of school, day care provider, church, whether or not to vaccinate, etc., then the normal procedure is to first mediate, and if that fails, then to bring a motion and let the Court decide. [7] When this happens, the Court must decide using a “best interest of the child” standard. [8] There is no preference given to the primary physical custodian. [9]
Legal custody is defined as "the right to determine the child's upbringing, including education, health care, and religious training." [1] Most of the time, parties to a custody case are awarded joint legal custody, which means that "both parents have equal rights and responsibilities, including the right to participate in major decisions determining the child's upbringing, including education, health care, and religious training." [2]
In deciding whether to award joint legal custody, the Court considers the following factors:
- the willingness and ability of parents to cooperate in the rearing of their child,
- to maximize sharing information and minimize exposure of the child to parental conflict, and
- to utilize methods for resolving disputes regarding any major decision concerning the life of the child. [3]
In my experience, the Court will almost always award joint legal custody, unless there are strong reasons not to, such as a very serious inability to cooperate or communicate, [6] or serious parental disfunction on the part of one parent—e.g., serious alcohol or drug addiction, physical or sexual abusiveness, or a long history of a lack of involvement in the children's parenting.
Should parties with joint legal custody ever reach an impasse over a legal custody issue, such as the choice of school, day care provider, church, whether or not to vaccinate, etc., then the normal procedure is to first mediate, and if that fails, then to bring a motion and let the Court decide. [7] When this happens, the Court must decide using a “best interest of the child” standard. [8] There is no preference given to the primary physical custodian. [9]
- Minnesota Statute section 518.003, Subdivision 3(a).
- Minnesota Statute section 518.003, Subdivision 3(b).
- Minnesota Statute section 518.17, Subdivision 1(a)(12).
- Minnesota Statute section 518.17, Subdivision 1(b)(9).
- Id.
- Veit v. Veit, 413 N.W.2d 601 (Minn.Ct.App. 1987) (reversing sole legal custody award where the lack of cooperation on which is was based was found to be of recent origin and the result of the dissolution proceeding).
- Novak v. Novak, 446 N.W.2d 422 (Minn.Ct.App. 1989).
- Id.
- Id.